Screenshots & trailers
Review sentiment over time
Weekly positive-review rate (green) and review volume (bars). Dashed lines mark significant patches; the amber line is the start of the current scoring window. Hover the dots to see what drove a dip or a jump.
How this score was computed
The VGC Score is a weighted blend on a press-comparable 0-100 quality scale. Steam approval rates are first calibrated (95% positive on Steam ≈ 89.5 quality, since Steam approval skews high). Press and tracked creator reviews each count ~2x a player review and share one cap against player evidence (creator buy/skip calls pool into an approval rate, calibrated like Steam approval); all-time sentiment is capped and halved (it's context, not verdict); reviews of the current build carry the most weight when a fresh patch anchors the window; and a 'typical game' prior keeps small samples from pegging the scale. Because press reviews and Metacritic user aggregates describe the launch build, their weight decays as the game ages (3-year half-life after a 1-year grace). That's how a game that launched rough can outgrow its old reception once updates win players over. Reviews under 2h playtime (the refund window), non-Steam activations, and free copies are downweighted.
| Component | Positive | Quality (0-100) | Weight (pseudo-reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press reviews (OpenCritic) | – | 72 | 20 |
| All-time Steam reviews | 92% | 86 | 24 |
| Metacritic user ratings | – | – | 0 |
| Post-patch Steam reviews (trust-weighted) | 100% | 97 | 1 |
| Calibration prior (typical game) | – | 72 | 50 |
Scoring window: last 30 days (no significant patch detected) · 4 reviews sampled · 3 total reviews in window · weighted 2.5 up / 0 down · computed 2h ago · full methodology →
Press & Creators reviews (20)
Individual verdicts from outlets we track: scored reviews first, most trusted outlets first among them. The small badge is each outlet's trust score: how well its scoring history aligns with players.
- 75
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek isn’t a perfect game. It’s short, simple, and clearly aimed at a younger demographic rather than hardcore horror fans. But what it does well, capturing the spooky but fun tone of R.L. Stine’s novels, it does very well. For longtime fans, the Easter eggs and references make it a treat. For younger players, it’s a safe and accessible introduction to the horror genre. For everyone else, it’s a fun, atmospheric diversion that would feel more justified at half the price. If you grew up with Goosebumps and want to relive those nostalgic chills, or if you’re looking for a spooky adventure to share with younger gamers, this is worth a playthrough. Just don’t expect it to keep you up at night… unless you were already afraid of the basement.”
read full review ↗ - 82
“Does a great job of combining a classic childhood sense of adventure, low-impact scares, and smart puzzles”
read full review ↗ - 60
“Still, with the campaign running for around four or five hours, this is a breezy experience that repurposes many of the main elements from the horror genre for kids. The art direction is a bit bland and it certainly won’t entertain anyone above the age of 15, but as a spooky experience for young’uns there are some scrappy spooks on offer here.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“If you want to share your love for the genre with your little ones in an easily digestible form, this might be the perfect starting point.”
read full review ↗ - 67
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek is a mixed bag of tricks and treats, as is typical for Halloween, only unfortunately, the tricks outweigh the treats. It's a game that knows and caters to its target audience, but at the same time squanders the potential to be truly great. With more modern gameplay mechanics, faster movement, and more creative puzzles, this title could have been a genuine classic. As it stands, it remains a solid but ultimately average adventure game that will primarily appeal to nostalgia buffs and younger players.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“The game is fully voice acted with a small cast of characters that helps keep things focused as well as a pretty straight story that’s simple but enjoyable, especially for younger gamers, I played this with my young son and the balance of adventure and horror very much appealed to him without being overly scary, perfect for the upcoming Halloween season!”
read full review ↗ - 58
“Through TV and movie adaptions, Stine's stories live on through new generations. Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek is yet another tale in this saga. I would encourage young players to try out this game, purely for the narrative and puzzle elements. The finicky controls are much more forgivable for young gamers, so Goosebumps would be a much more enjoyable experience for the intended audience. Any adult Goosebumps fans, however, will find themselves disappointed in the outcome.”
read full review ↗ - 65
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek gets the books right: they're easy to read, scary, and have just the right amount of mystery to get your imagination going. It's not a great work of art, but it's not the disaster that many people thought it would be. You like it for what it is, just like the Goosebumps books. Not because it's perfect, but because it's fun.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Is Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek as good as Resident Evil or Silent Hill? Of course not, but it's a valiant attempt at bringing the survival horror genre to a younger generation, or the wimps of an older generation. It's a surprisingly enjoyable romp, filled with light scares, tense exploration and some solid puzzles.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek does a solid job of building an original story in R.L Stine’s universe that pays homage to the classics and builds up a nice amount of tension with some decent puzzles and surprisingly good voice acting. It even has multiple endings. It is a tad short though, and at the current price tag, can be a little bit of a tougher proposition to swallow. It is also pretty easy to breeze through, though the game never feels overly padded and is paced well enough to mostly be enjoyable and the combat’s a bit of a slog. A good first time horror for kids or super fans of the Goosebumps world, despite a somewhat surface level substance.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek is an fun and spooky adventure that introduces younger audiences to the thrills of horror gaming, all whilst staying true to the playfully eerie (and mostly light-hearted) spirit of R. L. Stine’s classic series of books. With its solid and varied puzzles, fun references to all sorts of Goosebumps lore, and just enough eerie atmosphere to keep players on edge, it’s a game well worth checking out. Gamer beware… you’re in for a scare (sorry, I just had to say it).”
read full review ↗ - 60
“Goosebumps: Terror in Little Creek captures the spirit of the book series but ultimately falls short with a weak story setup, shallow characters, and repetitive gameplay. While the stealth mechanics and hide-and-seek tension show promise, the lack of variety and a simplistic combat system quickly undermine the experience. With stronger storytelling and deeper mechanics, it could have been a far more memorable horror adventure for younger audiences.”
read full review ↗
TheBigBois
Nindie Spotlight
Push Square
Digitec Magazine
neXGam
Games Freezer
Game Hype UK
NoobFeed
GameSpew
Expansive
Use a Potion
Gamer's Palace…and 8 more tracked reviews.
Patch history
No patch announcements found on Steam yet.