How this trust score was computed
Trust blends alignment (40%): does the outlet rank games the way players do; decoded accuracy (30%): after translating the outlet's own scale habits (a '7/10 means mediocre' scale is decoded, not punished), how well its reviews predict player sentiment; and player-side (30%): on games where press consensus and players sharply disagreed, whose side it took. Recent reviews weigh more (2-year half-life), and the blend is shrunk toward a neutral prior (60) so small samples can't peg the scale. Player quality is launch-window Steam sentiment, so outlets aren't punished for reviewing a launch build that later got patched.
Computed 29m ago · full methodology →
Outlet vs. players
Each dot is a game both this outlet and players scored. The dashed line is perfect agreement: dots above it mean the outlet was more generous than players, below it more harsh.
Recent reviews (8 tracked)
- 80Tooth and TailSep 12, 2017 · Álvaro Oliveira Almeida
“Funny and cute RTS, but extremely hard!”
read full review ↗ - 95
- 95Hyper Light DrifterAug 3, 2017 · Álvaro Oliveira Almeida
“It's hard but it's worth it”
read full review ↗ - 85
- 95
- 100
- 100
- 100Momodora: Reverie Under The MoonlightNov 5, 2016 · Álvaro Oliveira Almeida
“Awesome metroidvania game with souls like elements!”
read full review ↗
