How this trust score was computed
This reviewer publishes verdicts, not numbers, so trust comes from their recommend/pan calls: call accuracy (50%): when they say buy, do players end up satisfied, and when they say skip, do players agree; alignment (25%): do their recommendations sort games the way players do; and player-side (25%): on games where press and players sharply disagreed, whose side were they on. The blend is shrunk toward a neutral prior (60) so small histories can't peg the scale, and recent verdicts weigh more (2-year half-life).
Computed 6m ago · full methodology →
Outlet vs. players
Each dot is a game both this outlet and players scored. The dashed line is perfect agreement: dots above it mean the outlet was more generous than players, below it more harsh.
Recent reviews (6 tracked)
- 80WattamDec 18, 2019 · Andrew King
“At times it feels like playing around with a chemistry set. Except it can only produce fun and harmless explosions.”
read full review ↗ - 50Felix The ReaperOct 17, 2019 · Andrew King
“Felix the Reaper is an exhaustingly tedious puzzle game that attempts to set itself apart with the patina of a quirky thematic approach.”
read full review ↗ - 65IndivisibleOct 7, 2019 · Kyle Hilliard
“The core elements of Indivisible, like the story and the action, are interesting, but an overall lack of polish holds it back.”
read full review ↗ - 75Yooka-Laylee and the Impossible LairOct 3, 2019 · James O'Connor
“Yooka-Laylee and the Impossible Lair dials back expectations for the better in this more focused sequel.”
read full review ↗ - 87Neo CabOct 2, 2019 · Victoria Rose
“Taking place mostly in your rideshare car, Neo Cab offers a fascinating premise through a small and memorable cast of city dwellers. It's not politically shy, and it has fascinating worldbuilding down to the mundane.”
read full review ↗ - 70Creature in the WellSep 5, 2019 · Suriel Vazquez
“Creature in the Well has a promising premise, but fails to build it into something as challenging (and rewarding) as it ought to be.”
read full review ↗