Screenshots & trailers
How this score was computed
The VGC Score is a weighted blend on a press-comparable 0-100 quality scale. Steam approval rates are first calibrated (95% positive on Steam ≈ 89.5 quality, since Steam approval skews high). Press and tracked creator reviews each count ~2x a player review and share one cap against player evidence (creator buy/skip calls pool into an approval rate, calibrated like Steam approval); all-time sentiment is capped and halved (it's context, not verdict); reviews of the current build carry the most weight when a fresh patch anchors the window; and a 'typical game' prior keeps small samples from pegging the scale. Because press reviews and Metacritic user aggregates describe the launch build, their weight decays as the game ages (3-year half-life after a 1-year grace). That's how a game that launched rough can outgrow its old reception once updates win players over. Reviews under 2h playtime (the refund window), non-Steam activations, and free copies are downweighted.
| Component | Positive | Quality (0-100) | Weight (pseudo-reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press reviews (Metacritic) | – | 55 | 20 |
| All-time Steam reviews | – | – | 0 |
| Metacritic user ratings | – | 63 | 70 |
| Backloggd ratings | – | 43 | 183 |
| Xbox store ratings | – | 65 | 166 |
| Post-patch Steam reviews (trust-weighted) | – | – | 0 |
| Calibration prior (typical game) | – | 72 | 50 |
Scoring window: last 30 days (no significant patch detected) · 0 reviews sampled · 0 total reviews in window · weighted 0 up / 0 down · computed 4h ago · full methodology →
Press & Creators reviews (12)
Individual verdicts from outlets we track: scored reviews first, most trusted outlets first among them. The small badge is each outlet's trust score: how well its scoring history aligns with players.
- 40
“Sure, it'll probably provide you with a cheap thrill for 10 minutes or so, but look any further, and you'll realise that this is just the chassis of a far better game.”
read full review ↗ - 50
“For what could be an exciting arcade racer Table Top Racing: World Tour fails to make an impression. It's an acceptable racer but it does little to distinguish itself leaving it feeling standard and boring.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“Although very enjoyable in small doses, Table Top Racing: World Tour doesn’t carry quite enough substance to make it past the finish line with flying colours.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“It also has no local multiplayer, which seems bizarre as it would really boost the game’s lifespan but hopefully this will come in a future update. Until then, you may as well give it a try while it’s on PlayStation Plus, however, Table Top Racing: World Tour remains an entirely forgettable experience, full of caveats and missed opportunities.”
read full review ↗ - 65
“Table Top Racing: World Tour mixes humour and frenetic gameplay with multi-player madness.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“In the end, Table Top Racing: World Tour is a serviceable combat racing game.”
read full review ↗ - 66
“Table Top Racing World Tour fails of its essential purpose: be funny without any complications. ”
read full review ↗ - 70
“The overwhelming sense of Grandpa Mario racing around his garage lingers in the back of your mind as you twist and turn your way through these short tracks.”
read full review ↗ - 46
“This is yet another one of those games that suggests easily accessible racing fun in the tradition of Maicro Machines or Mario Kart, but fails to deliver on a wide scale.”
read full review ↗ - 68
“It has a fun, solid base, but it lacks the spark that makes a game like this one unique.”
read full review ↗ - 40
“Table Top Racing combines the mini game that is Micro Machines with the battles in Mario Kart, but it forgets to also add the fun aspect of these titles.”
read full review ↗ - 50
“Table Top Racing: World Tour is a forgettable experience, undermined by poor gameplay and questionable graphic quality. ”
read full review ↗
Push Square
GameGrin
TheSixthAxis
GameSpew
IGN
Hobby Consolas
Multiplayer.it