Screenshots & trailers
Review sentiment over time
Weekly positive-review rate (green) and review volume (bars). Dashed lines mark significant patches; the amber line is the start of the current scoring window. Hover the dots to see what drove a dip or a jump.
How this score was computed
The VGC Score is a weighted blend on a press-comparable 0-100 quality scale. Steam approval rates are first calibrated (95% positive on Steam ≈ 89.5 quality, since Steam approval skews high). Press and tracked creator reviews each count ~2x a player review and share one cap against player evidence (creator buy/skip calls pool into an approval rate, calibrated like Steam approval); all-time sentiment is capped and halved (it's context, not verdict); reviews of the current build carry the most weight when a fresh patch anchors the window; and a 'typical game' prior keeps small samples from pegging the scale. Because press reviews and Metacritic user aggregates describe the launch build, their weight decays as the game ages (3-year half-life after a 1-year grace). That's how a game that launched rough can outgrow its old reception once updates win players over. Reviews under 2h playtime (the refund window), non-Steam activations, and free copies are downweighted.
| Component | Positive | Quality (0-100) | Weight (pseudo-reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press reviews (OpenCritic) | – | 69 | 8 |
| All-time Steam reviews | 86% | 80 | 1000 |
| Metacritic user ratings | – | 76 | 3 |
| Post-patch Steam reviews (trust-weighted) | 83% | 76 | 71 |
| Calibration prior (typical game) | – | 72 | 50 |
Scoring window: since the last significant patch (Jun 4, 2026) · 71 reviews sampled · 57 total reviews in window · weighted 30.8 up / 6.5 down · computed 2h ago · full methodology →
Press & Creators reviews (31)
Individual verdicts from outlets we track: scored reviews first, most trusted outlets first among them. The small badge is each outlet's trust score: how well its scoring history aligns with players.
- 50
“Tannenberg has authenticity in spades. Sadly, middling animations, unreliable AI, and uninspiring combat sully what could've been a remarkable experience.”
read full review ↗ - 85
“M2H and Blackmill Games have executed their concept so well that the most glaring criticism is that there is not more. With such good a foundation as Verdun, it would have been nice to see a greater variety of maps, or perhaps even some different objective based modes. While it should be noted that fans of run and gun in faster-paced shooters may be frustrated with the game's more methodical pacing, Tanneberg is a satisfying tactical shooter.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“Tannenberg is a strategic shooter that pays incredible attention to detail. The presentation might not be AAA, big-budget level, but the developers have put together a compelling mode of play that is easy to sink many hours into. Here is hoping for more growth in the player base, because the early lack of online players does potentially limit Tannenberg’s potential long-term appeal.”
read full review ↗ - 68
“Tannenberg delivers a generally solid experience on Xbox One bringing with it bots that can keep the action going forever and large theaters of war.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“If you're looking for a first-person shooter that is slightly different from the standard run of the mill FPS, Tannenberg is the way to go. Gameplay, the feel of the guns and map choice is all solid and makes for a great experience, but Tannenberg is held back by its lack of players and a mediocre class system.”
read full review ↗ - 50
“I often feel uncomfortable playing military shooters. Is it really morally acceptable for me to be having fun in a virtual playground that depicts a real life conflict in which thousands lost their lives? I don't know the answer, but thankfully Tannenberg never forces me to consider this ethical question. Tannenberg has some good ideas, but it's a slightly dull online FPS that never really gets going. As a budget multiplayer shooter there's some satisfaction to be had, but overall this is a far too limited and sluggish experience.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Glitches, inept AI, and low player counts aside, I do still recommend giving Tannenberg a shot, especially if you are looking for a game that really nails the look, feel, and atmosphere of WWI.”
read full review ↗ - 50
“Developers held in their hands quite an ingenious and powerful weapon capable of attracting a whole mass of gamers hungry for a good shooter, but unfortunately, even the best weapon in the hands of an inexperienced soldier won't make a sensation. The title, plagued by irritating bugs, poor graphics, and disappointing playerbase, debuted on PlayStation 4 at a price of 20 USD, and although this amount is several times lower than what we pay for AAA titles at launch, given the aforementioned problems, some buyers might still feel they overpaid for the product.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“Although it deserves recognition for its attempt to be historically faithful, for hardcore damage mechanics and good combat dynamic, Tannenberg is also a little disappointing: weapons are more or less the same, unlocks lack impact, and class division is basically pointless. [Issue#236, p.38]”
- 80
“The price tag that the game boasts is actually less than I would have been happy to pay for it, after sinking quite a few hours into it. If you want a mindless shooter, then Tannenberg definitely isn’t for you. If you like to plan your actions, and if you’re methodical about how you proceed through a map, Tannenberg should be right up your alley.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“An intense and authentic World War 1 shooter with emphasis on caution, tactics and team coordination. Unfortunately, it’s never going to win any beauty contests, and then there’s the real elephant in the room - sparsely populated servers. ”
read full review ↗ - 50
…and 19 more tracked reviews.
Patch history
- Gallipoli - Ctesiphon & Anzac Cove UpdateJun 4, 2026significant · resets scoring window
- Update v66919Oct 21, 2025
- The Moschin Expansion & free DLC upgrade are OUT NOW for Isonzo!Apr 24, 2025significant · resets scoring window
- Update v59635Feb 25, 2025
- Update v54578Aug 1, 2024
- v319.50466 - Third Party Connectivity FixMar 4, 2024
- v318.36109 - Map voting patchJun 1, 2022
- Fix for save data issuesMay 9, 2022
- Save System Update & MoreMar 31, 2022
- Progression Loss & Disconnect Issues UpdateMar 3, 2022
- Stability Update - 9 FebFeb 9, 2022
- Stability Update for frequent disconnectsFeb 4, 2022
