Screenshots & trailers
Review sentiment over time
Weekly positive-review rate (green) and review volume (bars). Dashed lines mark significant patches; the amber line is the start of the current scoring window. Hover the dots to see what drove a dip or a jump.
How this score was computed
The VGC Score is a weighted blend on a press-comparable 0-100 quality scale. Steam approval rates are first calibrated (95% positive on Steam ≈ 89.5 quality, since Steam approval skews high). Press and tracked creator reviews each count ~2x a player review and share one cap against player evidence (creator buy/skip calls pool into an approval rate, calibrated like Steam approval); all-time sentiment is capped and halved (it's context, not verdict); reviews of the current build carry the most weight when a fresh patch anchors the window; and a 'typical game' prior keeps small samples from pegging the scale. Because press reviews and Metacritic user aggregates describe the launch build, their weight decays as the game ages (3-year half-life after a 1-year grace). That's how a game that launched rough can outgrow its old reception once updates win players over. Reviews under 2h playtime (the refund window), non-Steam activations, and free copies are downweighted.
| Component | Positive | Quality (0-100) | Weight (pseudo-reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press reviews (OpenCritic) | – | 72 | 14 |
| All-time Steam reviews | 79% | 73 | 99 |
| Metacritic user ratings | – | – | 0 |
| Post-patch Steam reviews (trust-weighted) | – | – | 0 |
| Calibration prior (typical game) | – | 72 | 50 |
Scoring window: last 30 days (no significant patch detected) · 0 reviews sampled · 0 total reviews in window · weighted 0 up / 0 down · computed 4h ago · full methodology →
Press & Creators reviews (31)
Individual verdicts from outlets we track: scored reviews first, most trusted outlets first among them. The small badge is each outlet's trust score: how well its scoring history aligns with players.
- 70
“The name "Museum archives" perfectly embodies the essence of the Namco Museum Archives - Volume 1 collection. Not all games have retained their fascination, but this is a great way to look at the game history through the early works of Namco.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“NES and Namco fans will be happy with the titles on offer here. Some of them have never been released in the west before and the star of the show, Pac-Man Championship Edition, is an entirely new NES port created just for this collection. Each of the 11 games has at least some value, but the bare-bones nature of the presentation is a little disappointing: for a game with Museum in the title, we'd hoped each game would have been celebrated a little more with art and behind-the-scenes info.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“There are many, many ways that NAMCO MUSEUM ARCHIVES Vol 1 could be better, but as a whole, fans of retro gaming will definitely love this. Apart from the greedy idea of separating 20 super-old games between two collections, the only thing really holding this back right now is its price. So, put it on your wishlist… and wait.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“If it were one complete collection it’d be easily recommended but, as two separate purchases, these are for hardcore Namco fans only.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“Namco Museum Archives: Volume 1 and 2 is yet another worthy compilation that feels right at home on the Switch.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“All that being said, it is overall hard to recommend Namco Museum Archives Volume 1 aside from checking out old Famicom and NES versions of games. The two major exceptions are Pac-Man Championship Edition and the previously Japan-only Splatterhouse: Wanpaku Graffiti. If you want to see a neat demake of a great Pac-Man game or a cool never-before-seen Namco platformer, by all means go dive into this collection. But aside from those two games, there isn't much here but NES and Famicom versions of arcade games.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Split archives aside, your love of Namco Museum Archives Volume 1 will be dependent on how much you love the NES and how you feel about this mix. Half of these games are better represented by their arcade versions, and depending on your platform of choice, you may already have access to them via the older Namco Museum compilations. However, NES originals like Splatterhouse and Dragon Spirit are as excellent today as they were decades ago, while the demake of Pac-Man Championship Edition simply has to be seen to be believed. For the investment price of $19.99, retro fans will like this title quite a bit.”
read full review ↗ - 50
“Without any unique selling points or cool trappings and additional content, I can’t recommend buying this collection.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“Both volumes of the Namco Museum Archives have their own strong points, despite the mediocre rewind feature.”
read full review ↗ - 60
“Mainly a collection dedicated to Namco and NES fans, as these are surely the players who mostly enjoy this set of retro games. The games, well known to the public, can easily show their worthiness individually, but on overall the package fails to provide significant added value overall. You can enjoy an exclusive in Europe and completely new title produced especially for this collection.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“GREAT - Namco Museum Archives Volume 1 is the best Switch compilation from the company so far. With 10 classic NES games (most of which never appeared in this country before) and a demake of Pac-Man Championship Edition, there’s a lot to like here!”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Namco Museum Archive Vol 1 is like a fresh air for you. It awakes tons of good memories and feels really nostalgic. Here we have the games that we grew up with and made history in game industry. Variety of genres with smooth controls and new features like manual save or replay function, make this collection worthy. I mean, who doesn't love Pac-Man!”
read full review ↗
…and 19 more tracked reviews.
Patch history
No patch announcements found on Steam yet.
