Screenshots & trailers
Review sentiment over time
Weekly positive-review rate (green) and review volume (bars). Dashed lines mark significant patches; the amber line is the start of the current scoring window. Hover the dots to see what drove a dip or a jump.
How this score was computed
The VGC Score is a weighted blend on a press-comparable 0-100 quality scale. Steam approval rates are first calibrated (95% positive on Steam ≈ 89.5 quality, since Steam approval skews high). Press and tracked creator reviews each count ~2x a player review and share one cap against player evidence (creator buy/skip calls pool into an approval rate, calibrated like Steam approval); all-time sentiment is capped and halved (it's context, not verdict); reviews of the current build carry the most weight when a fresh patch anchors the window; and a 'typical game' prior keeps small samples from pegging the scale. Because press reviews and Metacritic user aggregates describe the launch build, their weight decays as the game ages (3-year half-life after a 1-year grace). That's how a game that launched rough can outgrow its old reception once updates win players over. Reviews under 2h playtime (the refund window), non-Steam activations, and free copies are downweighted.
| Component | Positive | Quality (0-100) | Weight (pseudo-reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Press reviews (OpenCritic) | – | 78 | 134 |
| All-time Steam reviews | 84% | 78 | 353 |
| Metacritic user ratings | – | 63 | 31 |
| Post-patch Steam reviews (trust-weighted) | 77% | 72 | 278 |
| Calibration prior (typical game) | – | 72 | 50 |
Scoring window: since the last significant patch (Jul 29, 2025) · 278 reviews sampled · 264 total reviews in window · weighted 203.8 up / 59.6 down · computed 2h ago · full methodology →
Press & Creators reviews (83)
Individual verdicts from outlets we track: scored reviews first, most trusted outlets first among them. The small badge is each outlet's trust score: how well its scoring history aligns with players.
- 70
“The Legend of Heroes: Trails Through Daybreak II does a good job of optimizing combat and dungeon exploration, and the new features and tweaks likely will appeal to series fans. Its slow story and propensity to disrupt its own momentum, however, make this a slight downgrade from the previous game, and a middling entry in the series.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“Trails Through Daybreak II doesn't feel nearly as refreshing as its predecessor, but it's still a solid entry in the long-running series that ticks the necessary boxes (legible text aside). Though its story isn't all that exceptional, the combat is as rewarding as ever and new gameplay features like the Marchen Garten help to make this feel distinct and worthwhile. And while we wouldn't necessarily suggest that this is a great starting point for newcomers, series fans will find lots to love here, even if it won't be topping many lists as a series favourite.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“While it may not be the most meorable entry in the series, The Legend of Heroes: Trails through Daybreak II still has plenty that series fans thoroughly enjoy. Spending more time with the memorable and delightful cast is never a bad thing, and even though there are elements that don’t quite hit the same or feel a bit superfluous, there’s never any point where the game is in danger of becoming grating.”
read full review ↗ - 85
“Maybe Daybreak II will be seen in a similar light a decade from now. But whether that’s true or not, what’s here, what we do know about, is damn good, and more than enough to merit playing. Even if you do have to start all the way back at the beginning to understand some of it.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“Trails Through Daybreak 2 is very much a middle entry in what feels like a planned trilogy. It doesn’t reinvent the series the way Daybreak 1 did, nor does it push the story forward in a massive way. Instead, it builds upon what came before, refines the combat, and lays the groundwork for what’s coming next.”
read full review ↗ - 82
“Albeit not perfect, Trails Through Daybreak 2 is still a solid entry in the series: it's innovative, full of content, it has great characters and it brilliantly reiterates all the saga's features we know and love. Its weaknesses lie in the nature of the title, which does not provide many answers lore-wise and instead functions as a sort of transitional stage leading to Kai no Kiseki.”
read full review ↗ - 70
“I walk away from Trails Through Daybreak II feeling very little beyond “well, that all worked distressingly well.” In some ways, that is kind of a bad thing. This is a game that does nothing badly in a large sense. There is nothing I can point to and say “holy crap, that is a huge misfire on a fundamental level,” and in some ways that makes the game a bit boring. It accomplishes all of its goals in a very reliable fashion and doesn’t shoot beyond those goals and, as someone who generally gets invested in characters and story, the fact that those didn’t totally connect renders the experience a bit lukewarm for me. Sorry.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“The Legend of Heroes: Trails Through Daybreak II is strikingly similar to Trails into Reverie, in that it comes with a seriously uneven narrative and yet rock-solid overall content.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Returning to Calvard and spending more time with Arkride Solutions is always welcome, but a mediocre storyline harms what is otherwise another excellent entry.”
read full review ↗ - 90
“The Legend of Heroes: Trails through Daybreak II seemed like a good way to show how old franchises can still improve over time. The title managed to capitalize on all the strengths of its predecessor, improving them, while working to correct the weaknesses.”
read full review ↗ - 75
“Faced with a game that for two acts seems to go around in circles around nothing, for one seems like an interesting spin-off of itself and for the last two becomes a beautiful DLC of its predecessor, I find it difficult to reach a clear conclusion. Analytically, this game would still reach sufficiency, percentage-wise the content that entertained me is more than that which bored me. However, the "bad" part is at the beginning, which makes it difficult to approach both for another run, and if I have to recommend a first run to someone. In the end, the conclusion I reached is that I liked the overall experience. It is not a masterpiece, I find the choice to drag out the broth to make it a standalone chapter frustrating but what works, works really well. Unfortunately this is not the sequel that Daybreak, a game that today in retrospect I would easily give a 10, deserves. But it's not a bad Trails and fans of the series should give it a chance, even if only as a bridge to the next chapter, Kai no Kiseki, which was released to much greater success and which I can't wait to play.”
read full review ↗ - 80
“Trails Through Daybreak II stands out as a solid sequel that expands on Calvard's political and personal stakes while deepening its characters. Despite a sometimes uneven pace and a technically inferior Switch version, the captivating story and improved combat make it a must-play JRPG. The PS5 remains the best option to fully enjoy the experience and is my top recommendation at this time.”
read full review ↗
Pure Nintendo
Nintendo Life
RPGamer
Paste Magazine
ani-game.com
SpaceNerd.it
Gamer Escape
VGChartz
Gamer Guides
Pizza Fria
Gamesource Italia
Geeks & Com…and 71 more tracked reviews.
Patch history
- Version 1.2.15 Release NotesJul 29, 2025significant · resets scoring window
- Version 1.2.8 - Introducing TAA and DLSS SupportMar 17, 2025significant · resets scoring window
- v1.1.8 Release NotesMar 2, 2025significant · resets scoring window
- v1.1.7 Release NotesFeb 20, 2025
- v1.1.5 Release NotesFeb 17, 2025
- v1.1.3 Release NotesFeb 15, 2025