How this trust score was computed
This reviewer publishes verdicts, not numbers, so trust comes from their recommend/pan calls: call accuracy (50%): when they say buy, do players end up satisfied, and when they say skip, do players agree; alignment (25%): do their recommendations sort games the way players do; and player-side (25%): on games where press and players sharply disagreed, whose side were they on. The blend is shrunk toward a neutral prior (60) so small histories can't peg the scale, and recent verdicts weigh more (2-year half-life).
Controversy record: on 2 games where press consensus and players sharply disagreed, this reviewer sided with players 0 times.
Computed 5m ago · full methodology →
Outlet vs. players
Each dot is a game both this outlet and players scored. The dashed line is perfect agreement: dots above it mean the outlet was more generous than players, below it more harsh.
Biggest disagreements with players
The receipts: games where this outlet's verdict landed furthest from player sentiment.
Recent reviews (120 tracked)
- –BattleriteNov 26, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Battle Chasers: NightwarOct 10, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Road RedemptionOct 6, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –CupheadOct 1, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Tooth and TailSep 13, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Battlestar Galactica DeadlockSep 4, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Nidhogg 2Aug 21, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –LawBreakersAug 13, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –PyreAug 2, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –AntiheroJul 29, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –EVERSPACE™Jun 6, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –The Sexy BrutaleMay 2, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –Immortal RedneckApr 27, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –FaeriaMar 12, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
- –DESYNCMar 11, 2017 · John Bainread full review ↗
