Who can you trust?
Every press outlet and creator is rated by one standard: do their verdicts align with what players end up thinking of the same games? The scale each reviewer uses is decoded, not punished. What matters is whether knowing their verdict tells you what players will think, and whose side they take when press and players disagree. How it works →
avg trust · 775 rated · back players 36% of the time when press and players clash
avg trust · 19 rated · back players 37% of the time when press and players clash
The biggest names · hover for their record
International press
Non-English publications, held to the same standard. Regional subsidiaries of global brands (IGN Italy et al.) are consolidated into the parent brand on the English board.
890 reviews on record · 422 compared
Least aligned with players
Everyone else · smaller outlets, provisional ratings
Under 20 usable reviews or a limited public track record; these lean on the neutral prior and firm up as the corpus grows.
119 reviews on record · 49 compared
253 reviews on record · 151 compared
155 reviews on record · 85 compared
168 reviews on record · 103 compared
50 reviews on record · 7 compared
International creators
Non-English video reviewers with real audiences, same standard as everyone else.